That's the thing - he seems to only be less involved because they were babies, not because they were girls. Once the girls hit 4, he was fine, according to the article.
Vigrel
1 year ago
In a way, you could say that. I look at it more as something for all visitors. Anyone that comes through those doors should be decent. To me, that's not so much of a dress code, just like "No shirt, no shoes, no service" isn't considered a dress code.
(2)
Shakara
1 year ago
That's the thing - he seems to only be less involved because they were babies, not because they were girls. Once the girls hit 4, he was fine, according to the article.
Vigrel
1 year ago
In a way, you could say that. I look at it more as something for all visitors. Anyone that comes through those doors should be decent. To me, that's not so much of a dress code, just like "No shirt, no shoes, no service" isn't considered a dress code.